Science

Wikipedia surpassing (and correcting) Encyclopaedia Britannica
I found this interesting. I think the discussion about Wikipedia can no longer be about credibility, but about which will become the most influencial encyclopedia of our time. Wikipedia’s content may not be created by a number of payed editors of a single publisher. It is more evolving out of various sources, experts from around the world. Who controls Information? Who are the experts correcting the experts at Wikipedia? I know. But the same could be asked for the Encyclopaedia Britannica. After all it’s a proprietary format that gives space through credibility, for a lot of errors.
Oxford Dictionary—Opinionated about twenty something bloggers?
The Oxford Dictionary is implemented in the current release of the Mac OS codenamed Tiger. It is using an odd line for an application example of the word blog in american english. Sure, it’s just to show how it…